[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtCVeOGLiQ4gNPSf@yury-laptop>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 15:15:20 -0700
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] lib: cleanup bitmap-related headers
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:28:21AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 10:42 AM Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > This series unifies declarations of bitmap-related functions and aligns
> > return types with values that actually returned. Also, it moves one-liner
> > wrappers around cpumask functions into headers, so that compiler has a
> > chance to optimize better.
> >
> > With this series, GCC 11.2 for ARM64 with kernel v5.19-rc4:
> > add/remove: 15/7 grow/shrink: 461/164 up/down: 14844/-4580 (10264)
> >
> > This +10K didn't surprise me because modern compilers are more aggressive
> > in inlining, loop unrolling, and other techniques that increase size of
> > the image.
> >
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/YsAzU3g2QpgmIGre@smile.fi.intel.com/T/
> > v2: - Align whitespaces in headers;
> > - Make bitmap_weight() unsigned long consistently;
> > - Pick 2 patches from Ingo's sched/headers series [1] that split
> > linux/gfp.h, and drop my similar patch for it.
>
> Ping?
OK, I realize that it's not the very entertaining thing to review a
headers cleanup.
Adding this into -next because there's no negative feedback (he-he).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists