linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/speculation: Use DECLARE_PER_CPU for x86_spec_ctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220714151845.59905190@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 15:18:45 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/speculation: Use DECLARE_PER_CPU for
 x86_spec_ctrl_current

On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 15:14:53 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:56 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I have clang 13, let me double check this fix is enough for the build
> > to complete without disabling WERROR.  
> 
> I have clang 14 locally, and it builds fine with that (and doesn't
> build without it).

FWIW I can confirm - builds with clang 13 as well.

> I actually normally build the kernel with both gcc and clang. My
> "upstream" kernel I build with gcc, and then I have my "private random
> collection of patches" kernel that I build with clang and that are
> just rebased on top of the kernel-of-the-day.
> 
> This is all entirely for historical reasons - part of my "private
> random collection of patches" used to be the "asm goto with outputs",
> which had clang support first.
> 
> But then the reason I never even noticed the build breakage with the
> retbleed patches until much too late was that those I just had as a
> third fork off my upstream kernel, so despite me usually building with
> clang too, that only got attention from gcc.
> 
> So it's really just a microcosm version of the exact same bigger issue
> we always have with those embargoed hw security patches: they end up
> missing out on all the usual test environments.
> 
> Anyway, I cherry-picked Nathan's patch from my clang tree and pushed
> it out as commit db886979683a ("x86/speculation: Use DECLARE_PER_CPU
> for x86_spec_ctrl_current").

Awesome, thanks!