linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task: fix address space of proc_dohung_task_timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cf13ed5f-9219-af65-3a2f-301cc465f35b@microchip.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 08:23:10 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <ben.dooks@...ive.com>, <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <sudip.mukherjee@...ive.com>, <jude.onyenegecha@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task: fix address space of
 proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs

On 14/07/2022 09:20, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 14/07/2022 09:10, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
>> On 14/07/2022 08:47, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>
>> Hey Ben,
>> Odd CC list here? I assume you're piping get_maintainer into
>> send-email or something, but idk who is going to see or apply
>> this patch! Ditto your other one for this file.
> 
> Since (see below) the script wasn't clear I just cc our management.
> 
>>
>> Might be worth adding some of what get_maintainer spits out:
>> Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> (commit_signer:4/4=100%,authored:1/4=25%,removed_lines:10/15=67%)
>> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> (commit_signer:2/4=50%)
>> Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> (commit_signer:1/4=25%,authored:1/4=25%,removed_lines:1/15=7%)
>> John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de> (commit_signer:1/4=25%,authored:1/4=25%,added_lines:10/90=11%,removed_lines:1/15=7%)
>> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> (commit_signer:1/4=25%)
>> Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com> (authored:1/4=25%,added_lines:78/90=87%,removed_lines:3/15=20%)
> 
> I think only akpm would be one of those, given no overall
> maintainer I had a look and just use the kernel list and
> hope someone picks it up.

Yeah, adding Andrew would be a good option. And I guess
kernel-janitors?