[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220714094709.6ekfnfcf5sktiegi@maple.lan>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:47:09 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: ChiaEn Wu <peterwu.pub@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
Alice Chen <alice_chen@...htek.com>,
cy_huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
szuni chen <szunichen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/13] video: backlight: mt6370: Add Mediatek MT6370
support
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 11:27:07AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 9:13 AM ChiaEn Wu <peterwu.pub@...il.com> wrote:
> > I have tried two methods so far, as follows
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > /*
> > * prop_val = 1 --> 1 steps --> b'00
> > * prop_val = 2 ~ 4 --> 4 steps --> b'01
> > * prop_val = 5 ~ 16 --> 16 steps --> b'10
> > * prop_val = 17 ~ 64 --> 64 steps --> b'11
> > */
>
> So, for 1 --> 0, for 2 --> 1, for 5 --> 2, and for 17 --> 3.
> Now, consider x - 1:
> 0 ( 0 ) --> 0
> 1 (2^0) --> 1
> 4 (2^2) --> 2
> 16 (2^4) --> 3
> 64 (2^6) --> ? (but let's consider that the range has been checked already)
>
> Since we take the lower limit, it means ffs():
>
> y = (ffs(x - 1) + 1) / 2;
>
> Does it work for you?
To be honest, for this tiny table, writing code that *doesn't* require intricate
deciphering together with a huge comment saying what is does would probably be
better:
prop_val = (prop_val <= 1 ? 0 :
prop_val <= 4 ? 1 :
prop_val <= 16 ? 2 :
3);
This would be "obviously correct" and require no comment.
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists