linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] MIPS: cpuinfo: Fix a warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220714095440.GA10086@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:54:40 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...il.com>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] MIPS: cpuinfo: Fix a warning for
 CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 04:41:34PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is selected,
> cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning similar as below while
> we show /proc/cpuinfo. Fix this by using nr_cpu_ids (the runtime limit)
> instead of NR_CPUS to iterate CPUs.
> 
> [    3.052463] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    3.059679] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at include/linux/cpumask.h:108 show_cpuinfo+0x5e8/0x5f0
> [    3.070072] Modules linked in: efivarfs autofs4
> [    3.076257] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.19-rc5+ #1052
> [    3.084034] Hardware name: Loongson Loongson-3A4000-7A1000-1w-V0.1-CRB/Loongson-LS3A4000-7A1000-1w-EVB-V1.21, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018-V2.0.04082-beta7 04/27
> [    3.099465] Stack : 9000000100157b08 9000000000f18530 9000000000cf846c 9000000100154000
> [    3.109127]         9000000100157a50 0000000000000000 9000000100157a58 9000000000ef7430
> [    3.118774]         90000001001578e8 0000000000000040 0000000000000020 ffffffffffffffff
> [    3.128412]         0000000000aaaaaa 1ab25f00eec96a37 900000010021de80 900000000101c890
> [    3.138056]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000aaaaaa
> [    3.147711]         ffff8000339dc220 0000000000000001 0000000006ab4000 0000000000000000
> [    3.157364]         900000000101c998 0000000000000004 9000000000ef7430 0000000000000000
> [    3.167012]         0000000000000009 000000000000006c 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [    3.176641]         9000000000d3de08 9000000001639390 90000000002086d8 00007ffff0080286
> [    3.186260]         00000000000000b0 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000071c1c
> [    3.195868]         ...
> [    3.199917] Call Trace:
> [    3.203941] [<98000000002086d8>] show_stack+0x38/0x14c
> [    3.210666] [<9800000000cf846c>] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x88
> [    3.217625] [<980000000023d268>] __warn+0xd0/0x100
> [    3.223958] [<9800000000cf3c90>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x7c/0xcc
> [    3.231150] [<9800000000210220>] show_cpuinfo+0x5e8/0x5f0
> [    3.238080] [<98000000004f578c>] seq_read_iter+0x354/0x4b4
> [    3.245098] [<98000000004c2e90>] new_sync_read+0x17c/0x1c4
> [    3.252114] [<98000000004c5174>] vfs_read+0x138/0x1d0
> [    3.258694] [<98000000004c55f8>] ksys_read+0x70/0x100
> [    3.265265] [<9800000000cfde9c>] do_syscall+0x7c/0x94
> [    3.271820] [<9800000000202fe4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160
> [    3.281824] ---[ end trace 8b484262b4b8c24c ]---
> 
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
> ---
>  arch/mips/kernel/proc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]