[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220714101207.5qh3bfvadqrorerp@quack3>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 12:12:07 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk, neilb@...e.de,
johannes.thumshirn@....com, jack@...e.cz, willy@...radead.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] writeback: Cleanup inode_to_wb_is_valid()
On Thu 14-07-22 16:41:47, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> inode_to_wb_is_valid() is no longer used since commit fe55d563d417
> ("remove inode_congested()"), remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
Looks good! Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> include/linux/backing-dev.h | 17 -----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> index d452071db572..f9f14e385582 100644
> --- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> @@ -235,18 +235,6 @@ wb_get_create_current(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, gfp_t gfp)
> return wb;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * inode_to_wb_is_valid - test whether an inode has a wb associated
> - * @inode: inode of interest
> - *
> - * Returns %true if @inode has a wb associated. May be called without any
> - * locking.
> - */
> -static inline bool inode_to_wb_is_valid(struct inode *inode)
> -{
> - return inode->i_wb;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * inode_to_wb - determine the wb of an inode
> * @inode: inode of interest
> @@ -345,11 +333,6 @@ wb_get_create_current(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, gfp_t gfp)
> return &bdi->wb;
> }
>
> -static inline bool inode_to_wb_is_valid(struct inode *inode)
> -{
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> static inline struct bdi_writeback *inode_to_wb(struct inode *inode)
> {
> return &inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists