lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000000000000471c2905e3c2c2c2@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 05:08:26 -0700
From:   syzbot <syzbot+2d2aeadc6ce1e1f11d45@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        tytso@....edu
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in start_this_handle (3)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    5a29232d870d Merge tag 'for-5.19-rc6-tag' of git://git.ker..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16619ce8080000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=525bc0635a2b942a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2d2aeadc6ce1e1f11d45
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: i386

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+2d2aeadc6ce1e1f11d45@...kaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-rc6-syzkaller-00026-g5a29232d870d #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
khugepaged/48 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888044598990 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}, at: start_this_handle+0xfb4/0x14a0 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:461

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8bebdb20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __perform_reclaim mm/page_alloc.c:4638 [inline]
ffffffff8bebdb20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim mm/page_alloc.c:4663 [inline]
ffffffff8bebdb20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x9e1/0x2160 mm/page_alloc.c:5066

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:4589 [inline]
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x115/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:4603
       might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:271 [inline]
       slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:723 [inline]
       slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3157 [inline]
       slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3251 [inline]
       kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x40/0x3f0 mm/slub.c:3282
       kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:600 [inline]
       memory_stat_format+0x95/0xae0 mm/memcontrol.c:1468
       mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo.cold+0x50/0x7e mm/memcontrol.c:1594
       dump_header+0x13f/0x7f9 mm/oom_kill.c:462
       oom_kill_process.cold+0x10/0x15 mm/oom_kill.c:1037
       out_of_memory+0x358/0x14b0 mm/oom_kill.c:1175
       mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0x206/0x270 mm/memcontrol.c:1650
       memory_max_write+0x25c/0x3b0 mm/memcontrol.c:6299
       cgroup_file_write+0x1de/0x770 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:3882
       kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3f8/0x610 fs/kernfs/file.c:290
       call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2058 [inline]
       new_sync_write+0x38a/0x560 fs/read_write.c:504
       vfs_write+0x7c0/0xac0 fs/read_write.c:591
       ksys_write+0x127/0x250 fs/read_write.c:644
       do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline]
       __do_fast_syscall_32+0x65/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178
       do_fast_syscall_32+0x2f/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203
       entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x53/0x62

-> #1 (oom_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
       mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0x8d/0x270 mm/memcontrol.c:1640
       mem_cgroup_oom mm/memcontrol.c:1880 [inline]
       try_charge_memcg+0xef9/0x1380 mm/memcontrol.c:2670
       obj_cgroup_charge_pages mm/memcontrol.c:2999 [inline]
       obj_cgroup_charge+0x2ab/0x5e0 mm/memcontrol.c:3289
       memcg_slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:505 [inline]
       slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:728 [inline]
       slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3157 [inline]
       slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3251 [inline]
       __kmem_cache_alloc_lru mm/slub.c:3258 [inline]
       kmem_cache_alloc+0x92/0x3b0 mm/slub.c:3268
       kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:723 [inline]
       alloc_buffer_head+0x20/0x140 fs/buffer.c:3294
       alloc_page_buffers+0x285/0x7a0 fs/buffer.c:829
       grow_dev_page fs/buffer.c:965 [inline]
       grow_buffers fs/buffer.c:1011 [inline]
       __getblk_slow+0x525/0x1080 fs/buffer.c:1038
       __getblk_gfp+0x6e/0x80 fs/buffer.c:1333
       sb_getblk include/linux/buffer_head.h:326 [inline]
       ext4_getblk+0x20d/0x7c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:866
       ext4_bread+0x2a/0x1c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:912
       ext4_append+0x177/0x3a0 fs/ext4/namei.c:67
       ext4_init_new_dir+0x25e/0x4d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2920
       ext4_mkdir+0x3cf/0xb20 fs/ext4/namei.c:2966
       vfs_mkdir+0x1c3/0x3b0 fs/namei.c:3975
       do_mkdirat+0x285/0x300 fs/namei.c:4001
       __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4016 [inline]
       __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4014 [inline]
       __ia32_sys_mkdirat+0x81/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4014
       do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline]
       __do_fast_syscall_32+0x65/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178
       do_fast_syscall_32+0x2f/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203
       entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x53/0x62

-> #0 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2abe/0x5660 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5665 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5630
       start_this_handle+0xfe7/0x14a0 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:463
       jbd2__journal_start+0x399/0x930 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:520
       __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x3a8/0x4a0 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:105
       __ext4_journal_start fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:326 [inline]
       ext4_dirty_inode+0x9d/0x110 fs/ext4/inode.c:5949
       __mark_inode_dirty+0x495/0x1050 fs/fs-writeback.c:2381
       mark_inode_dirty_sync include/linux/fs.h:2337 [inline]
       iput.part.0+0x57/0x820 fs/inode.c:1767
       iput+0x58/0x70 fs/inode.c:1760
       dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
       __dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
       shrink_dentry_list+0x23c/0x800 fs/dcache.c:1201
       prune_dcache_sb+0xe7/0x140 fs/dcache.c:1282
       super_cache_scan+0x336/0x590 fs/super.c:104
       do_shrink_slab+0x42d/0xbd0 mm/vmscan.c:770
       shrink_slab+0x17c/0x6f0 mm/vmscan.c:930
       shrink_node_memcgs mm/vmscan.c:3124 [inline]
       shrink_node+0x8b3/0x1db0 mm/vmscan.c:3245
       shrink_zones mm/vmscan.c:3482 [inline]
       do_try_to_free_pages+0x3b5/0x1700 mm/vmscan.c:3540
       try_to_free_pages+0x2ac/0x840 mm/vmscan.c:3775
       __perform_reclaim mm/page_alloc.c:4641 [inline]
       __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim mm/page_alloc.c:4663 [inline]
       __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa8a/0x2160 mm/page_alloc.c:5066
       __alloc_pages+0x436/0x510 mm/page_alloc.c:5439
       __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:587 [inline]
       khugepaged_alloc_page+0xa0/0x170 mm/khugepaged.c:859
       collapse_huge_page mm/khugepaged.c:1062 [inline]
       khugepaged_scan_pmd mm/khugepaged.c:1348 [inline]
       khugepaged_scan_mm_slot mm/khugepaged.c:2170 [inline]
       khugepaged_do_scan mm/khugepaged.c:2251 [inline]
       khugepaged+0x3473/0x66a0 mm/khugepaged.c:2296
       kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:302

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  jbd2_handle --> oom_lock --> fs_reclaim

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(oom_lock);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
  lock(jbd2_handle);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by khugepaged/48:
 #0: ffffffff8bebdb20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __perform_reclaim mm/page_alloc.c:4638 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8bebdb20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim mm/page_alloc.c:4663 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8bebdb20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x9e1/0x2160 mm/page_alloc.c:5066
 #1: ffffffff8be7d850 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0xc9/0x6f0 mm/vmscan.c:920
 #2: ffff8880445800e0 (&type->s_umount_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super fs/super.c:415 [inline]
 #2: ffff8880445800e0 (&type->s_umount_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x6c/0x590 fs/super.c:79

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 48 Comm: khugepaged Not tainted 5.19.0-rc6-syzkaller-00026-g5a29232d870d #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2abe/0x5660 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5665 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5630
 start_this_handle+0xfe7/0x14a0 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:463
 jbd2__journal_start+0x399/0x930 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:520
 __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x3a8/0x4a0 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:105
 __ext4_journal_start fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:326 [inline]
 ext4_dirty_inode+0x9d/0x110 fs/ext4/inode.c:5949
 __mark_inode_dirty+0x495/0x1050 fs/fs-writeback.c:2381
 mark_inode_dirty_sync include/linux/fs.h:2337 [inline]
 iput.part.0+0x57/0x820 fs/inode.c:1767
 iput+0x58/0x70 fs/inode.c:1760
 dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
 __dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
 shrink_dentry_list+0x23c/0x800 fs/dcache.c:1201
 prune_dcache_sb+0xe7/0x140 fs/dcache.c:1282
 super_cache_scan+0x336/0x590 fs/super.c:104
 do_shrink_slab+0x42d/0xbd0 mm/vmscan.c:770
 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x6f0 mm/vmscan.c:930
 shrink_node_memcgs mm/vmscan.c:3124 [inline]
 shrink_node+0x8b3/0x1db0 mm/vmscan.c:3245
 shrink_zones mm/vmscan.c:3482 [inline]
 do_try_to_free_pages+0x3b5/0x1700 mm/vmscan.c:3540
 try_to_free_pages+0x2ac/0x840 mm/vmscan.c:3775
 __perform_reclaim mm/page_alloc.c:4641 [inline]
 __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim mm/page_alloc.c:4663 [inline]
 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa8a/0x2160 mm/page_alloc.c:5066
 __alloc_pages+0x436/0x510 mm/page_alloc.c:5439
 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:587 [inline]
 khugepaged_alloc_page+0xa0/0x170 mm/khugepaged.c:859
 collapse_huge_page mm/khugepaged.c:1062 [inline]
 khugepaged_scan_pmd mm/khugepaged.c:1348 [inline]
 khugepaged_scan_mm_slot mm/khugepaged.c:2170 [inline]
 khugepaged_do_scan mm/khugepaged.c:2251 [inline]
 khugepaged+0x3473/0x66a0 mm/khugepaged.c:2296
 kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:302
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ