[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220714121002.wm6byk6puajnzvmo@houat>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:10:02 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/modes: Add support for driver-specific named
modes
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 11:04:09AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The mode parsing code recognizes named modes only if they are explicitly
> listed in the internal whitelist, which is currently limited to "NTSC"
> and "PAL".
>
> Provide a mechanism for drivers to override this list to support custom
> mode names.
>
> Ideally, this list should just come from the driver's actual list of
> modes, but connector->probed_modes is not yet populated at the time of
> parsing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Like we discussed on IRC, I'm not sure allowing drivers to handle named
modes is the right thing to do.
Named modes in general were a workaround the fact that we were missing
infos in drm_display_mode to describe all the modes.
I think we really should focus on addressing that first, and then
creating some kind of backward compat layer to create an initial DRM
state from a named mode provided on the command line.
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists