linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/39] drm/i915: i915_gem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:25:40 -0400
From:   Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
CC:     Thomas Hellström 
        <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
        <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/39] drm/i915: i915_gem_wait.c: fix a
 kernel-doc markup

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:12:08AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The return codes for i915_gem_wait_ioctl() have identation issues,
> and will be displayed on a very confusing way. Use lists to improve
> its output.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>

> ---
> 
> To avoid mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover.
> See [PATCH v2 00/39] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1657699522.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> index 4a33ad2d122b..1fd5cff552ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> @@ -210,23 +210,25 @@ static unsigned long to_wait_timeout(s64 timeout_ns)
>   * @data: ioctl data blob
>   * @file: drm file pointer
>   *
> - * Returns 0 if successful, else an error is returned with the remaining time in
> - * the timeout parameter.
> - *  -ETIME: object is still busy after timeout
> - *  -ERESTARTSYS: signal interrupted the wait
> - *  -ENONENT: object doesn't exist
> - * Also possible, but rare:
> - *  -EAGAIN: incomplete, restart syscall
> - *  -ENOMEM: damn
> - *  -ENODEV: Internal IRQ fail
> - *  -E?: The add request failed
> - *
>   * The wait ioctl with a timeout of 0 reimplements the busy ioctl. With any
>   * non-zero timeout parameter the wait ioctl will wait for the given number of
>   * nanoseconds on an object becoming unbusy. Since the wait itself does so
>   * without holding struct_mutex the object may become re-busied before this
>   * function completes. A similar but shorter * race condition exists in the busy
>   * ioctl
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 if successful, else an error is returned with the remaining time in
> + * the timeout parameter.
> + * * -ETIME: object is still busy after timeout
> + * * -ERESTARTSYS: signal interrupted the wait
> + * * -ENONENT: object doesn't exist
> + *
> + * Also possible, but rare:
> + * * -EAGAIN: incomplete, restart syscall
> + * * -ENOMEM: damn
> + * * -ENODEV: Internal IRQ fail
> + * * -E?: The add request failed
>   */
>  int
>  i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> -- 
> 2.36.1
>