[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtHqlVx9/joj+AXH@codewreck.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 07:30:45 +0900
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
Cc: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Nikolay Kichukov <nikolay@...um.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] remove msize limit in virtio transport
Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:35:26PM +0200:
> * Patches 7..11 tremendously reduce unnecessarily huge 9p message sizes and
> therefore provide performance gain as well. So far, almost all 9p messages
> simply allocated message buffers exactly msize large, even for messages
> that actually just needed few bytes. So these patches make sense by
> themselves, independent of this overall series, however for this series
> even more, because the larger msize, the more this issue would have hurt
> otherwise.
Unless they got stuck somewhere the mails are missing patches 10 and 11,
one too many 0s to git send-email ?
I'll do a quick review from github commit meanwhile
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists