[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e97bc607-a913-dbbd-1965-b60d55d956b8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:49:48 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
WeiXiong Liao <gmpy.liaowx@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>
Subject: Invalid pstore_blk use?
Hi Kees, WeiXiong,
I am trying to make use of pstore_blk which is BTW exactly what I had
been looking for to store panic/console logs onto an eMMC partition.
Using the 5.10 kernel plus:
7e2e92e9861b Revert "mark pstore-blk as broken"
01c28bc8f389 pstore/blk: Use the normal block device I/O path
2a7507999638 pstore/blk: remove {un,}register_pstore_blk
fef0b337cd25 pstore/zone: cap the maximum device size
or the android13-5.15 (at Merge 5.15.40 into android13-5.15) kernel with
no changes and using:
mount -t pstore pstore /sys/fs/pstore
modprobe pstore_blk blkdev=/dev/mmcblk1p9 best_effort=yes
upon triggering a crash with:
echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger
and rebooting and remounting the pstore filesystem and loading
pstore_blk, I only have:
# ls /sys/fs/pstore/
console-pstore_blk-0
which contains the entire console log up to, but excluding the crash.
The kernel does show that pstore_blk was used for all 3 types of kmsg,
pmsg and console:
[ 28.649514] pstore_zone: capping size to 128MiB
[ 28.712894] pstore_zone: registered pstore_blk as backend for
kmsg(Oops) pmsg console
[ 28.721145] pstore: Using crash dump compression: deflate
[ 28.906253] printk: console [pstore_blk-1] enabled
[ 28.911229] pstore: Registered pstore_blk as persistent store backend
[ 28.917735] pstore_blk: attached pstore_blk:/dev/mmcblk1p9
(134217728) (no dedicated panic_write!)
there is no automatic reboot upon panic, so I just tend to reboot after
2-3 seconds manually. The kernel is configured with the default
CONFIG_PSTORE_* options.
Is the observed behavior a limitation of the best_effort mode? If so, do
we have any plans to implementing a non-best effort mode for eMMC devices?
Thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists