[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220715040949.3807070-1-quic_kshivnan@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:39:49 +0530
From: Shivnandan Kumar <quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <len.brown@...el.com>, <pavel@....cz>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Shivnandan Kumar" <quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3]PM: QoS: Add check to make sure CPU freq is non-negative
CPU frequency should never be negative.
If some client driver calls freq_qos_update_request with
negative value which will be very high in absolute terms,
then qos driver set max CPU freq at fmax as it consider
it's absolute value but it will add plist node with negative
priority. plist node has priority from INT_MIN (highest)
to INT_MAX(lowest). Once priority is set as negative,
another client will not be able to reduce CPU frequency.
Adding check to make sure CPU freq is non-negative will
fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: Shivnandan Kumar <quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com>
---
v2->v3
-changed commit text
v1->v2
-addressed comments from Rafael
-changed commit text accordingly
kernel/power/qos.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
index ec7e1e85923e..27e6596f287a 100644
--- a/kernel/power/qos.c
+++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ int freq_qos_add_request(struct freq_constraints *qos,
{
int ret;
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(qos) || !req)
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(qos) || !req || value < FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE)
return -EINVAL;
if (WARN(freq_qos_request_active(req),
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(freq_qos_add_request);
*/
int freq_qos_update_request(struct freq_qos_request *req, s32 new_value)
{
- if (!req)
+ if (!req || new_value < FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE)
return -EINVAL;
if (WARN(!freq_qos_request_active(req),
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists