lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Jul 2022 05:10:18 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 02:02:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c:951:19: error: 'no_llseek' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'noop_llseek'?
>   951 |         .llseek = no_llseek,
>       |                   ^~~~~~~~~
>       |                   noop_llseek
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   71f28f3136af ("ublk_drv: add io_uring based userspace block driver")
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   8804bffa93a1 ("fs: remove no_llseek")
> 
> from the vfs tree.

I suspect that it would be a good idea to slap
#define no_llseek NULL
into include/linux/fs.h for the merge window, then remove it (and all
stray no_llseek initializers) at -rc1.  Linus, would you be OK with
that approach?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ