[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54BB27F6-13A4-4EA6-8775-05BF5D8E2BC8@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:24:15 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
"mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"dave@...olabs.net" <dave@...olabs.net>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] mm/vmalloc: introduce vmalloc_exec which
allocates RO+X memory
> On Jul 14, 2022, at 11:15 AM, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 04:54:40AM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 13, 2022, at 9:23 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:49:45PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 13, 2022, at 3:08 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> NAK. This is not something that should be an exported public API
>>>>> ever.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm.. I will remove EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (if we ever do a v2 of this..)
>>>
>>> Even without that it really is not a vmalloc API anyway.
>>
>> This ...
>>
>>> Executable
>>> memory needs to be written first, so we should allocate it in that state
>>> and only mark it executable after that write has completed.
>>
>> ... and this are two separate NAKs.
>>
>> For the first NAK, I agree that my version is another layer on top of
>> vmalloc. But what do you think about Peter's idea? AFAICT, that fits
>> well in vmalloc logic.
>>
> I am not able to find the patch/change to see what you have done.
vger dropped my patch again. :(
> But
> please do not build a new allocator on top of vmalloc code. We have
> three different ones what make things to be complicated :)
It was a bpf_prog_pack like allocator, but named as vmalloc_exec(),
vfree_exec(). I guess I have got enough NAKs for it.
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists