linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 03/18] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220715061027.1612149-4-kaleshsingh@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:10:12 -0700
From:   Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
To:     maz@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
        madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
Cc:     will@...nel.org, qperret@...gle.com, tabba@...gle.com,
        kaleshsingh@...gle.com, james.morse@....com,
        alexandru.elisei@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, andreyknvl@...il.com,
        russell.king@...cle.com, vincenzo.frascino@....com,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, drjones@...hat.com,
        wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, elver@...gle.com, keirf@...gle.com,
        yuzenghui@...wei.com, ardb@...nel.org, oupton@...gle.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, android-mm@...gle.com,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/18] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common()

Move common unwind_next logic to stacktrace/common.h. This allows
reusing the code in the implementation the nVHE hypervisor stack
unwinder, later in this series.

Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c             | 41 ++----------------
 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
index f58b786460d3..0c5cbfdb56b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ struct unwind_state {
 static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
 				     struct stack_info *info);
 
+static inline bool on_accessible_stack(const struct task_struct *tsk,
+				       unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
+				       struct stack_info *info);
+
 static inline bool on_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
 			    unsigned long low, unsigned long high,
 			    enum stack_type type, struct stack_info *info)
@@ -120,4 +124,50 @@ static inline void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
 }
 
+static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
+				     struct stack_info *info)
+{
+	struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
+	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
+
+	if (fp & 0x7)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, info))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (test_bit(info->type, state->stacks_done))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
+	 * at a strictly higher address than the prior record.
+	 *
+	 * Stacks can nest in several valid orders, e.g.
+	 *
+	 * TASK -> IRQ -> OVERFLOW -> SDEI_NORMAL
+	 * TASK -> SDEI_NORMAL -> SDEI_CRITICAL -> OVERFLOW
+	 *
+	 * ... but the nesting itself is strict. Once we transition from one
+	 * stack to another, it's never valid to unwind back to that first
+	 * stack.
+	 */
+	if (info->type == state->prev_type) {
+		if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		__set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
+	 * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
+	 */
+	state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
+	state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
+	state->prev_fp = fp;
+	state->prev_type = info->type;
+
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif	/* __ASM_STACKTRACE_COMMON_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 94a5dd2ab8fd..834851939364 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -81,48 +81,15 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
 	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
 	struct stack_info info;
+	int err;
 
 	/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
 	if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	if (fp & 0x7)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	/*
-	 * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
-	 * at a strictly higher address than the prior record.
-	 *
-	 * Stacks can nest in several valid orders, e.g.
-	 *
-	 * TASK -> IRQ -> OVERFLOW -> SDEI_NORMAL
-	 * TASK -> SDEI_NORMAL -> SDEI_CRITICAL -> OVERFLOW
-	 *
-	 * ... but the nesting itself is strict. Once we transition from one
-	 * stack to another, it's never valid to unwind back to that first
-	 * stack.
-	 */
-	if (info.type == state->prev_type) {
-		if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
-			return -EINVAL;
-	} else {
-		__set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
-	 * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
-	 */
-	state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
-	state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
-	state->prev_fp = fp;
-	state->prev_type = info.type;
+	err = unwind_next_common(state, &info);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	state->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(state->pc);
 
-- 
2.37.0.170.g444d1eabd0-goog