[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220715061433.GS566407@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 08:14:33 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: <iamwjia@....com>
CC: <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, <dsahern@...nel.org>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@...tino.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] xfrm: Fix couple of spellings
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:45:29PM +0800, iamwjia@....com wrote:
> From: Wang Jia <iamwjia@....com>
>
> accomodate ==> accommodate
> destionation ==> destination
> execeeds ==> exceeds
> informations ==> information
>
> Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@...tino.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Jia <iamwjia@....com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ah6.c | 2 +-
> net/ipv6/esp6.c | 4 ++--
Your patch does not apply to ipsec-next, the fixes
for net/ipv6/esp6.c are already done there.
Please rebase your patch to ipsec-next, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists