lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220715102609.2160689-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:26:08 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
        Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] cacheinfo: Use atomic allocation for percpu cache attributes

On couple of architectures like RISC-V and ARM64, we need to detect
cache attribues quite early during the boot when the secondary CPUs
start. So we will call detect_cache_attributes in the atomic context
and since use of normal allocation can sleep, we will end up getting
"sleeping in the atomic context" bug splat.

In order avoid that, move the allocation to use atomic version in
preparation to move the actual detection of cache attributes in the
CPU hotplug path which is atomic.

Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
---
 drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Hi Greg,

Can you apply these couple of patches directly if and when you are happy
with them ?

Regards,
Sudeep

v1->v2: This was added in v2

diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
index 65d566ff24c4..4b5cd08c5a65 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ int detect_cache_attributes(unsigned int cpu)
 		return -ENOENT;

 	per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) = kcalloc(cache_leaves(cpu),
-					 sizeof(struct cacheinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
+					 sizeof(struct cacheinfo), GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) == NULL) {
 		cache_leaves(cpu) = 0;
 		return -ENOMEM;
--
2.37.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ