linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] usb: typec: tcpci_rt1711h: Add compatible with rt1715

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jul 2022 13:40:57 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Gene Chen <gene.chen.richtek@...il.com>
Cc:     linux@...ck-us.net, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, gene_chen@...htek.com,
        cy_huang@...htek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] usb: typec: tcpci_rt1711h: Add compatible with rt1715

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 06:04:18PM +0800, Gene Chen wrote:
> From: Gene Chen <gene_chen@...htek.com>
> 
> Add compatible with rt1715

I can not understand this changelog text at all.  As my bot would say:

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to
  properly describe the change.

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should
  look like.

Please fix up.

thanks,

greg k-h