[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220715122539.3978614-1-quic_kshivnan@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:55:39 +0530
From: Shivnandan Kumar <quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <len.brown@...el.com>, <pavel@....cz>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Shivnandan Kumar" <quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4]PM: QoS: Add check to make sure CPU freq is non-negative
CPU frequency should never be negative.
If some client driver calls freq_qos_update_request with
negative value which will be very high in absolute terms,
then qos driver sets max CPU freq at fmax as it considers
it's absolute value but it will add plist node with negative
priority. plist node has priority from INT_MIN (highest)
to INT_MAX(lowest). Once priority is set as negative,
another client will not be able to reduce CPU frequency.
Adding check to make sure CPU freq is non-negative will
fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: Shivnandan Kumar <quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com>
---
v3->v4
-used 0 instead of FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE
v2->v3
-changed commit text
v1->v2
-addressed comments from Rafael
-changed commit text accordingly
kernel/power/qos.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
index ec7e1e85923e..af51ed6d45ef 100644
--- a/kernel/power/qos.c
+++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ int freq_qos_add_request(struct freq_constraints *qos,
{
int ret;
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(qos) || !req)
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(qos) || !req || value < 0)
return -EINVAL;
if (WARN(freq_qos_request_active(req),
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(freq_qos_add_request);
*/
int freq_qos_update_request(struct freq_qos_request *req, s32 new_value)
{
- if (!req)
+ if (!req || new_value < 0)
return -EINVAL;
if (WARN(!freq_qos_request_active(req),
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists