[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220715023928.2701166-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 10:39:28 +0800
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To: <stable@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <tytso@....edu>,
<adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jack@...e.cz>,
<ritesh.list@...il.com>, <lczerner@...hat.com>,
<enwlinux@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <yebin10@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
<libaokun1@...wei.com>, Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_ioctl_setflags and ext4_fiemap
This patch and problem analysis is based on v4.19 LTS.
The d3b6f23f7167("ext4: move ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework") patch
is incorporated in v5.7-rc1. This patch avoids this problem by switching
to iomap in ext4_fiemap.
Hulk Robot reported a BUG on stable 4.19.252:
==================================================================
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:762!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 7 PID: 2845 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.19.252 #46
RIP: 0010:ext4_es_cache_extent+0x30e/0x370
[...]
Call Trace:
ext4_cache_extents+0x238/0x2f0
ext4_find_extent+0x785/0xa40
ext4_fiemap+0x36d/0xe90
do_vfs_ioctl+0x6af/0x1200
[...]
==================================================================
Above issue may happen as follows:
-------------------------------------
cpu1 cpu2
_____________________|_____________________
do_vfs_ioctl
ext4_ioctl
ext4_ioctl_setflags
ext4_ind_migrate
do_vfs_ioctl
ioctl_fiemap
ext4_fiemap
ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)
ext4_fill_fiemap_extents
down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
ext4_ext_check_inode
ext4_clear_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)
memset(ei->i_data, 0, sizeof(ei->i_data))
up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
ext4_find_extent
ext4_cache_extents
ext4_es_cache_extent
BUG_ON(end < lblk)
We can easily reproduce this problem with the syzkaller testcase:
```
02:37:07 executing program 3:
r0 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040)='./file0\x00', 0x26e1, 0x0)
ioctl$FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR(r0, 0x40086602, &(0x7f0000000080)={0x17e})
mkdirat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f00000000c0)='./file1\x00', 0x1ff)
r1 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000100)='./file1\x00', 0x0, 0x0)
ioctl$FS_IOC_FIEMAP(r1, 0xc020660b, &(0x7f0000000180)={0x0, 0x1, 0x0, 0xef3, 0x6, []}) (async, rerun: 32)
ioctl$FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR(r1, 0x40086602, &(0x7f0000000140)={0x17e}) (rerun: 32)
```
To solve this issue, we use __generic_block_fiemap() instead of
generic_block_fiemap() and add inode_lock_shared to avoid race condition.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 6c492fca60c4..38aaf48e94cb 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -5198,13 +5198,18 @@ int ext4_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
return error;
}
+ inode_lock_shared(inode);
/* fallback to generic here if not in extents fmt */
- if (!(ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)))
- return generic_block_fiemap(inode, fieinfo, start, len,
+ if (!(ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS))) {
+ error = __generic_block_fiemap(inode, fieinfo, start, len,
ext4_get_block);
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
- if (fiemap_check_flags(fieinfo, EXT4_FIEMAP_FLAGS))
- return -EBADR;
+ if (fiemap_check_flags(fieinfo, EXT4_FIEMAP_FLAGS)) {
+ error = -EBADR;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
if (fieinfo->fi_flags & FIEMAP_FLAG_XATTR) {
error = ext4_xattr_fiemap(inode, fieinfo);
@@ -5225,6 +5230,8 @@ int ext4_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
error = ext4_fill_fiemap_extents(inode, start_blk,
len_blks, fieinfo);
}
+out_unlock:
+ inode_unlock_shared(inode);
return error;
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists