linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:09:41 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stefan Binding <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Vitaly Rodionov <vitalyr@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound tree

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 5:39 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:44:43 +0200,
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the sound tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c: In function 'cs35l41_get_acpi_sub_string':
> > sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c:693:43: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct acpi_device'
> >   693 |         status = acpi_evaluate_object(adev->handle, "_SUB", NULL, &buffer);
> >       |                                           ^~
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> >   d60b05b4c780 ("ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Allow compilation test on non-ACPI configurations")
> >
> > along with commit
> >
> >   eef375960210 ("ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Support reading subsystem id from ACPI")
> >
> > I have reverted commit d60b05b4c780 for today.
>
> Thanks.  Now I reverted the commit on for-next branch as a workaround,
> too.

Thanks! OTOH it means it's working well :-)

Nevertheless, I have prepared a series to deduplicate this _SUB code
and I think the ACPI would stay as a compile dependency because of
that change anyway.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko