[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMkAt6p8_OUQ5rv7DsSjPX6_EUQV6TUn0L3Q4uT1B23e32PkSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 13:32:06 -0600
From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: selftests: Consolidate ucall code
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 8:55 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 6/18/22 02:16, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Consolidate the code for making and getting ucalls. All architectures pass
> > > the ucall struct via memory, so filling and copying the struct is 100%
> > > generic. The only per-arch code is sending and receiving the address of
> > > said struct.
> > >
> > > Tested on x86 and arm, compile tested on s390 and RISC-V.
> >
> > I'm not sure about doing this yet. The SEV tests added multiple
> > implementations of the ucalls in one architecture. I have rebased those
> > recently (not the SEV part) to get more familiar with the new kvm_vcpu API
> > for selftests, and was going to look at your old review next...
>
> I had forgotten about that code. My idea of a per-VM list[*] would fit nicely on
> top, though maybe drop the last patch from this series.
>
> [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yc4gcJdhxthBKUUd@google.com
I just sent an RFC of SEV selftesting using Sean's suggestion built on
the first 2 patches in this series. I think they work well with the
encrypted VMs ucalling.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220715192956.1873315-1-pgonda@google.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists