[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a6240da-9003-cd74-cd47-f95ba2d9e7ae@microchip.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:51:02 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, <conor@...nel.org>
CC: <ojeda@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<jarkko@...nel.org>, <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/25] Rust support
On 16/07/2022 14:36, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 2:42 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I am just missing something blatantly obvious here, but trying
>> to build rust support in -next fails for me. I am using ClangBuiltLinux
>> clang version 15.0.0 5b0788fef86ed7008a11f6ee19b9d86d42b6fcfa and LLD
>> 15.0.0. Is it just expected that building -next with rust support is
>> not a good idea?
>
> Please see https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/795 for
> details about the maple tree issue.
Ah right, sorry for the noise so. I checked the ml but didn't see a
report there.
>
> I will update the `rust-next` branch next week with the new version of
> the patches; but if you are interested in developing, please use the
> development `rust` branch instead in GitHub for the moment.
Thanks Miguel, good to know! I'll just wait around for a new version.
Just been trying to get my CI etc in order for when rust support lands,
but it sounds like I should be okay as it's a known problem & not some
only-broken-on-riscv thing.
Thanks,
Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists