linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_ioctl_setflags and ext4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <425ab528-7d9a-975a-7f4c-5f903cedd8bc@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 Jul 2022 10:33:30 +0800
From:   Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <stable@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jack@...e.cz>,
        <ritesh.list@...il.com>, <lczerner@...hat.com>,
        <enwlinux@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <yebin10@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
        Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>,
        Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_ioctl_setflags
 and ext4_fiemap

在 2022/7/15 22:10, Greg KH 写道:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:39:28AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
>> This patch and problem analysis is based on v4.19 LTS.
>> The d3b6f23f7167("ext4: move ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework") patch
>> is incorporated in v5.7-rc1. This patch avoids this problem by switching
>> to iomap in ext4_fiemap.
>>
>> Hulk Robot reported a BUG on stable 4.19.252:
>> ==================================================================
>> kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:762!
>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
>> CPU: 7 PID: 2845 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.19.252 #46
>> RIP: 0010:ext4_es_cache_extent+0x30e/0x370
>> [...]
>> Call Trace:
>>   ext4_cache_extents+0x238/0x2f0
>>   ext4_find_extent+0x785/0xa40
>>   ext4_fiemap+0x36d/0xe90
>>   do_vfs_ioctl+0x6af/0x1200
>> [...]
>> ==================================================================
>>
>> Above issue may happen as follows:
>> -------------------------------------
>>             cpu1		    cpu2
>> _____________________|_____________________
>> do_vfs_ioctl
>>   ext4_ioctl
>>    ext4_ioctl_setflags
>>     ext4_ind_migrate
>>                          do_vfs_ioctl
>>                           ioctl_fiemap
>>                            ext4_fiemap
>>                             ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)
>>                             ext4_fill_fiemap_extents
>>      down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
>>      ext4_ext_check_inode
>>      ext4_clear_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)
>>      memset(ei->i_data, 0, sizeof(ei->i_data))
>>      up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
>>                              down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
>>                              ext4_find_extent
>>                               ext4_cache_extents
>>                                ext4_es_cache_extent
>>                                 BUG_ON(end < lblk)
>>
>> We can easily reproduce this problem with the syzkaller testcase:
>> ```
>> 02:37:07 executing program 3:
>> r0 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040)='./file0\x00', 0x26e1, 0x0)
>> ioctl$FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR(r0, 0x40086602, &(0x7f0000000080)={0x17e})
>> mkdirat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f00000000c0)='./file1\x00', 0x1ff)
>> r1 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000100)='./file1\x00', 0x0, 0x0)
>> ioctl$FS_IOC_FIEMAP(r1, 0xc020660b, &(0x7f0000000180)={0x0, 0x1, 0x0, 0xef3, 0x6, []}) (async, rerun: 32)
>> ioctl$FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR(r1, 0x40086602, &(0x7f0000000140)={0x17e}) (rerun: 32)
>> ```
>>
>> To solve this issue, we use __generic_block_fiemap() instead of
>> generic_block_fiemap() and add inode_lock_shared to avoid race condition.
>>
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/ext4/extents.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> What is the git commit id of this change in Linus's tree?
>
> If it is not in Linus's tree, why not?
>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h
> .

This patch does not exist in the Linus' tree.

This problem persists until the patch d3b6f23f7167("ext4: move 
ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework") is incorporated in v5.7-rc1.

However, this problem can be found by asserting  after patch 
4068664e3cd2 ("ext4: fix extent_status fragmentation for plain files") 
is incorporated into v5.6-rc1.

If someone don't want to convert ext4_fiemap to iomap, this patch may help.

I also CC linux-ext4 in hopes of getting some advice.

Feel free to improve it if something wrong.

Thanks a lot!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li