linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: check return status for pressure and touch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220716172632.01fee63c@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sat, 16 Jul 2022 17:26:32 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Cc:     <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>, <lars@...afoo.de>,
        <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: check return
 status for pressure and touch

On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 17:25:31 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 18:16:14 +0300
> Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com> wrote:
> 
> > Check return status of at91_adc_read_position() and
> > at91_adc_read_pressure() in at91_adc_read_info_raw().
> > 
> > Fixes: 6794e23fa3fe ("iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: add support for oversampling resolution")
> > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 8 ++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> > index 32b6f157b803..c3301c749164 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> > @@ -1544,8 +1544,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_info_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >  		*val = tmp_val;
> >  		mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> >  		iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);  
> Prefer to keep error path out of line.
> 
> 		if (ret < 0)
> 			return ret;
> 
> 		return at91_adc_adjust_val_osr();
> 
> Also ends up as a slightly less invasive change.
Ah. I should have read on through the series. Ignore this.

> 
> > +		if (ret > 0)
> > +			ret = at91_adc_adjust_val_osr(st, val);
> >  
> > -		return at91_adc_adjust_val_osr(st, val);
> > +		return ret;
> >  	}
> >  	if (chan->type == IIO_PRESSURE) {
> >  		ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> > @@ -1558,8 +1560,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_info_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >  		*val = tmp_val;
> >  		mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> >  		iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> > +		if (ret > 0)
> > +			ret = at91_adc_adjust_val_osr(st, val);
> >  
> > -		return at91_adc_adjust_val_osr(st, val);  
> As above.
> 
> > +		return ret;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* in this case we have a voltage channel */  
>