[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220716222454.29914-7-jim2101024@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:24:53 -0400
From: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
To: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, jim2101024@...il.com,
james.quinlan@...adcom.com
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE),
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] PCI: brcmstb: Do not turn off WOL regulators on suspend
If any downstream device can be a wakeup device, do not turn off the
regulators as the device will need them on.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220106160332.2143-8-jim2101024@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index 88339fde0df7..570c98594d47 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct brcm_pcie {
bool refusal_mode;
bool regulator_oops;
struct subdev_regulators *sr;
+ bool ep_wakeup_capable;
};
static inline bool is_bmips(const struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
@@ -1301,9 +1302,21 @@ static void brcm_pcie_turn_off(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
pcie->bridge_sw_init_set(pcie, 1);
}
+static int pci_dev_may_wakeup(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
+{
+ bool *ret = data;
+
+ if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev)) {
+ *ret = true;
+ dev_info(&dev->dev, "disable cancelled for wake-up device\n");
+ }
+ return (int) *ret;
+}
+
static int brcm_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct brcm_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
int ret;
brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie);
@@ -1322,11 +1335,22 @@ static int brcm_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
}
if (pcie->sr) {
- ret = regulator_bulk_disable(pcie->sr->num_supplies, pcie->sr->supplies);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "Could not turn off regulators\n");
- reset_control_reset(pcie->rescal);
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * Now turn off the regulators, but if at least one
+ * downstream device is enabled as a wake-up source, do not
+ * turn off regulators.
+ */
+ pcie->ep_wakeup_capable = false;
+ pci_walk_bus(bridge->bus, pci_dev_may_wakeup,
+ &pcie->ep_wakeup_capable);
+ if (!pcie->ep_wakeup_capable) {
+ ret = regulator_bulk_disable(pcie->sr->num_supplies,
+ pcie->sr->supplies);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Could not turn off regulators\n");
+ reset_control_reset(pcie->rescal);
+ return ret;
+ }
}
}
clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
@@ -1371,11 +1395,21 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
goto err_reset;
if (pcie->sr) {
- ret = regulator_bulk_enable(pcie->sr->num_supplies,
- pcie->sr->supplies);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "Could not turn on regulators\n");
- goto err_reset;
+ if (pcie->ep_wakeup_capable) {
+ /*
+ * We are resuming from a suspend. In the suspend we
+ * did not disable the power supplies, so there is
+ * no need to enable them (and falsely increase their
+ * usage count).
+ */
+ pcie->ep_wakeup_capable = false;
+ } else {
+ ret = regulator_bulk_enable(pcie->sr->num_supplies,
+ pcie->sr->supplies);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Could not turn on regulators\n");
+ goto err_reset;
+ }
}
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists