[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220718180159.feglhlmu7a75axgv@pali>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 20:01:59 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>,
"open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI: brcmstb: Split brcm_pcie_setup() into two
funcs
On Monday 18 July 2022 12:05:28 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 09:37:08AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 9:11 AM Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > On Saturday 16 July 2022 18:24:49 Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > > > @@ -948,6 +941,40 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> > > > if (pcie->gen)
> > > > brcm_pcie_set_gen(pcie, pcie->gen);
> > > >
> > > > + /* Don't advertise L0s capability if 'aspm-no-l0s' */
> > > > + aspm_support = PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1;
> > > > + if (!of_property_read_bool(pcie->np, "aspm-no-l0s"))
> > > > + aspm_support |= PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S;
> > > > + tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > > > + u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, aspm_support,
> > > > + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY_ASPM_SUPPORT_MASK);
> > > > + writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * For config space accesses on the RC, show the right class for
> > > > + * a PCIe-PCIe bridge (the default setting is to be EP mode).
> > > > + */
> > > > + tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > > > + u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, 0x060400,
> > >
> > > There is already macro PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI_NORMAL, so please use it
> > > instead of magic constant.
> >
> > Will do, thanks.
>
> I can fix that up locally.
Great!
I did git grep on recent master branch and found another candidates with
magic numbers which refers to PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI_NORMAL:
arch/mips/pci/pci-mt7620.c: pcie_w32(0x06040001, RALINK_PCI0_CLASS);
arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c: rt3883_pci_w32(rpc, 0x06040001, RT3883_PCI_REG_CLASS(1));
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/pci.c: out_le32(mbase + 0x208, 0x06040001);
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c: u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, 0x060400,
(class code is stored in upper 24 bits of 32-bit register, so it makes
sense that on lowest 8 bits is something more - 0x01)
What do you think? Does it make sense to send patch which replace above
hex numbers by macros?
> > > I introduced it recently in commit:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=904b10fb189cc15376e9bfce1ef0282e68b0b004
> > >
> > > > + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3_CLASS_CODE_MASK);
> > > > + writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists