lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:28:34 -0700 From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 06/16] lib/test_bitmap: delete meaningless test for bitmap_cut One of bitmap_cut() tests passed it with: nbits = BITS_PER_LONG; first = BITS_PER_LONG; cut = BITS_PER_LONG; This test is useless because the range to cut is not inside the bitmap. This should normally raise an error, but bitmap_cut() is void and returns nothing. To check if the test is passed, it just tests that the memory is not touched by bitmap_cut(), which is probably not correct, because if a function is passed with wrong parameters, it's too optimistic to expect a correct, or even sane behavior. Now that we have bitmap_check_params(), there's a tool to detect such things in real code, and we can drop the test. Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> --- lib/test_bitmap.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c index 8bd279a7633f..c1ea449aae2d 100644 --- a/lib/test_bitmap.c +++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c @@ -707,10 +707,6 @@ static struct test_bitmap_cut test_cut[] = { { 15, 16, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x0000a5a5UL, }, }, { 16, 15, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x0001a5a5UL, }, }, - { BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_LONG, - { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, - { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, - }, { 1, BITS_PER_LONG - 1, BITS_PER_LONG, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x00000001UL, 0x00000001UL, }, -- 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists