[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220718192844.1805158-7-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:28:34 -0700
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/16] lib/test_bitmap: delete meaningless test for bitmap_cut
One of bitmap_cut() tests passed it with:
nbits = BITS_PER_LONG;
first = BITS_PER_LONG;
cut = BITS_PER_LONG;
This test is useless because the range to cut is not inside the
bitmap. This should normally raise an error, but bitmap_cut() is
void and returns nothing.
To check if the test is passed, it just tests that the memory is
not touched by bitmap_cut(), which is probably not correct, because
if a function is passed with wrong parameters, it's too optimistic
to expect a correct, or even sane behavior.
Now that we have bitmap_check_params(), there's a tool to detect such
things in real code, and we can drop the test.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
---
lib/test_bitmap.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c
index 8bd279a7633f..c1ea449aae2d 100644
--- a/lib/test_bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c
@@ -707,10 +707,6 @@ static struct test_bitmap_cut test_cut[] = {
{ 15, 16, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x0000a5a5UL, }, },
{ 16, 15, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x0001a5a5UL, }, },
- { BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_LONG,
- { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0xa5a5a5a5UL, },
- { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0xa5a5a5a5UL, },
- },
{ 1, BITS_PER_LONG - 1, BITS_PER_LONG,
{ 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0xa5a5a5a5UL, },
{ 0x00000001UL, 0x00000001UL, },
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists