linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] Re: [io_uring] 584b0180f0: phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialWrite.IO_uring.Yes.Yes.1MB.DefaultTestDirectory.mb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d70460d-0a85-4104-9abc-dd100af99e6f@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jul 2022 08:58:17 +0800
From:   Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lkp@...ts.01.org>, <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [io_uring] 584b0180f0:
 phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialWrite.IO_uring.Yes.Yes.1MB.DefaultTestDirectory.mb_s
 -10.2% regression



On 7/15/2022 11:58 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I can't really explain that either, at least not immediately. I tried
> running with and without that patch, and don't see any difference here.
> In terms of making this more obvious, does the below also fix it for
> you?
I will try the fix and let you know the result.

> 
> And what filesystem is this being run on?
I am using ext4 and LKP are also using ext4. Thanks.


Regards
Yin, Fengwei

> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index a01ea49f3017..797fad99780d 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -4269,9 +4269,6 @@ static int io_rw_init_file(struct io_kiocb *req, fmode_t mode)
>  	if (unlikely(!file || !(file->f_mode & mode)))
>  		return -EBADF;
>  
> -	if (!io_req_ffs_set(req))
> -		req->flags |= io_file_get_flags(file) << REQ_F_SUPPORT_NOWAIT_BIT;
> -
>  	kiocb->ki_flags = iocb_flags(file);
>  	ret = kiocb_set_rw_flags(kiocb, req->rw.flags);
>  	if (unlikely(ret))
> @@ -8309,7 +8306,13 @@ static bool io_assign_file(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>  	else
>  		req->file = io_file_get_normal(req, req->cqe.fd);
>  
> -	return !!req->file;
> +	if (unlikely(!req->file))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (!io_req_ffs_set(req))
> +		req->flags |= io_file_get_flags(file) << REQ_F_SUPPORT_NOWAIT_BIT;
> +
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)