linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] pwm: dwc: remove the CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a38e887f-fb79-349a-3985-35f1b603d105@sifive.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jul 2022 08:18:52 +0100
From:   Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
        Jude Onyenegecha <jude.onyenegecha@...ive.com>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ive.com>,
        William Salmon <william.salmon@...ive.com>,
        Adnan Chowdhury <adnan.chowdhury@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] pwm: dwc: remove the CONFIG_OF in timer clock

On 13/07/2022 07:11, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 11:20:23AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> On 12/07/2022 11:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 12/07/2022 12:01, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>>> We should probably change from the #ifdef added earlier in
>>>> 49a0f4692a8752c7b03cb26d54282bee5c8c71bb ("wm: dwc: add timer clock")
>>>> and just have it always in the dwc data so if we have a system with
>>>> both PCI and OF probing it should work
>>>>
>>>> -- consider merging with original patch
>>>
>>> Missing SoB. Please run checkpatch.
>>
>> This was meant to be an RFC about whether it should be a single patch
>> or merged back into the previous one.
> 
> +1 for merging these

Yes, done for v2.