linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YtUWB1ncCr1i3V5x@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:12:55 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Merge Intel PMIC core to
 crc

On Mon, 18 Jul 2022, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Jul 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 09:45:53AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > On 6/30/22 10:07, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > > Note that I already did a manual compare of the moved code blocks
> > > > to check that they were not changed before giving my Reviewed-by.
> > > 
> > > Super, thanks Hans.
> > 
> > Is it okay to be applied?
> 
> Yes, I think so.
> 
> Can you collect all of the Acked-by/Tested-by tags you received
> and submit a [RESEND] please?  Hans' TB which should be applied to all
> patches springs to mind.

To save yourself some pain, leave off my Acks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog