[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220718112446.lucl7omialqri7yv@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:23:59 +0000
From: Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"noname.nuno@...il.com" <noname.nuno@...il.com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] iio: trigger: move trig->owner init to trigger
allocate() stage
Hello Jonathan,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 04:25:56PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:04:36 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:59:59 +0000
> > Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Jonathan,
> > >
> > > This patch has been on the mailing list for one month already, but no
> > > comments from other IIO reviewers. What do you think we should do with it?
> > > Is it a helpful change or not?
> >
> > Given I'm way behind and timing in cycle, I'm probably going to kick this
> > back to start of the next cycle. Sorry for delay,
> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git.
>
> I'm unlikely to do another pull request this cycle unless there is a delay in
> the release for some reason (and probably not even if there is), so this
> is queued up for next cycle. As such it'll sit exposed only in the testing
> branch until I rebase on rc1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
Thank you for the patch applied.
I have one question about the previous already applied patchset
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607183907.20017-1-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru/
I see this patchset already merged to linux-next more than a month ago.
But it's still not available in the linux stable branch. Could you please
explain what's the problem with this one? Was some bug found during
linux-next testing stage? Should I fix something?
Appreciate any help to understand what's I missing.
--
Thank you,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists