[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220718121618.rpagy3vinzgdokxa@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:16:18 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] interconnect: Make icc_provider_del() return void
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 12:10:34PM +0300, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
> Thanks for the patchset!
>
> On 15.07.22 23:36, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > All users ignore the return value of icc_provider_del(). Consequently
> > make it not return an error code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/interconnect/core.c | 10 +++-------
> > include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> > index 808f6e7a8048..25debded65a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> > @@ -1057,29 +1057,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_add);
> > /**
> > * icc_provider_del() - delete previously added interconnect provider
> > * @provider: the interconnect provider that will be removed from topology
> > - *
> > - * Return: 0 on success, or an error code otherwise
> > */
> > -int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> > +void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> > {
> > mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
> > if (provider->users) {
> > pr_warn("interconnect provider still has %d users\n",
> > provider->users);
> > mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > + return;
> > }
>
> Looks like provider->users is now useless, so we should remove it. But that
> could be a separate clean-up.
Well, it's still used to emit the warning. If this can trigger there is
indeed a problem though. If there are still users, they should hold a
reference to the device preventing its release.
> > if (!list_empty(&provider->nodes)) {
> > pr_warn("interconnect provider still has nodes\n");
> > mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > + return;
> > }
> > list_del(&provider->provider_list);
> > mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_del);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> > index 6bd01f7159c6..191f083d1f3b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider);
> > void icc_node_del(struct icc_node *node);
> > int icc_nodes_remove(struct icc_provider *provider);
> > int icc_provider_add(struct icc_provider *provider);
> > -int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
> > +void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
> > struct icc_node_data *of_icc_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *spec);
> > void icc_sync_state(struct device *dev);
>
> We should also squash the following:
>
> --- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static inline int icc_provider_add(struct icc_provider *provider)
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> -static inline int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> +static inline void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> {
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
Sent a v2 with this change (and also removed the return statement).
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists