[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220715044659.20282-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:46:59 +0800
From: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix comment typo
The double `we' is duplicated in line 2569, remove one.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index fbeda5aa72e1..cd99e49d7ff1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -2566,7 +2566,7 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
* bits which we consider mandatory enabled.
* The CR0_READ_SHADOW is what L2 should have expected to read given
* the specifications by L1; It's not enough to take
- * vmcs12->cr0_read_shadow because on our cr0_guest_host_mask we we
+ * vmcs12->cr0_read_shadow because on our cr0_guest_host_mask we
* have more bits than L1 expected.
*/
vmx_set_cr0(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_cr0);
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists