[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <261f60dfe9813e612bfb30b6f271a68b9e877408.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 16:04:19 +0300
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/24] KVM: nVMX: Unconditionally clear mtf_pending
on nested VM-Exit
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 20:42 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Clear mtf_pending on nested VM-Exit instead of handling the clear on a
> case-by-case basis in vmx_check_nested_events(). The pending MTF should
> never survive nested VM-Exit, as it is a property of KVM's run of the
> current L2, i.e. should never affect the next L2 run by L1. In practice,
> this is likely a nop as getting to L1 with nested_run_pending is
> impossible, and KVM doesn't correctly handle morphing a pending exception
> that occurs on a prior injected exception (need for re-injected exception
> being the other case where MTF isn't cleared). However, KVM will
> hopefully soon correctly deal with a pending exception on top of an
> injected exception.
>
> Add a TODO to document that KVM has an inversion priority bug between
> SMIs and MTF (and trap-like #DBS), and that KVM also doesn't properly
> save/restore MTF across SMI/RSM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 104f233ddd5d..a85f31cee149 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -3898,16 +3898,8 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> unsigned long exit_qual;
> bool block_nested_events =
> vmx->nested.nested_run_pending || kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu);
> - bool mtf_pending = vmx->nested.mtf_pending;
> struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>
> - /*
> - * Clear the MTF state. If a higher priority VM-exit is delivered first,
> - * this state is discarded.
> - */
> - if (!block_nested_events)
> - vmx->nested.mtf_pending = false;
> -
> if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu) &&
> test_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &apic->pending_events)) {
> if (block_nested_events)
> @@ -3916,6 +3908,9 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> clear_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &apic->pending_events);
> if (vcpu->arch.mp_state != KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED)
> nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_INIT_SIGNAL, 0, 0);
> +
> + /* MTF is discarded if the vCPU is in WFS. */
> + vmx->nested.mtf_pending = false;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3938,6 +3933,11 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * fault-like exceptions, TSS T flag #DB (not emulated by KVM, but
> * could theoretically come in from userspace), and ICEBP (INT1).
> *
> + * TODO: SMIs have higher priority than MTF and trap-like #DBs (except
> + * for TSS T flag #DBs). KVM also doesn't save/restore pending MTF
> + * across SMI/RSM as it should; that needs to be addressed in order to
> + * prioritize SMI over MTF and trap-like #DBs.
Thanks, makes sense.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
> + *
> * Note that only a pending nested run can block a pending exception.
> * Otherwise an injected NMI/interrupt should either be
> * lost or delivered to the nested hypervisor in the IDT_VECTORING_INFO,
> @@ -3953,7 +3953,7 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (mtf_pending) {
> + if (vmx->nested.mtf_pending) {
> if (block_nested_events)
> return -EBUSY;
> nested_vmx_update_pending_dbg(vcpu);
> @@ -4549,6 +4549,9 @@ void nested_vmx_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vm_exit_reason,
> struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
>
> + /* Pending MTF traps are discarded on VM-Exit. */
> + vmx->nested.mtf_pending = false;
> +
> /* trying to cancel vmlaunch/vmresume is a bug */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(vmx->nested.nested_run_pending);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists