[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220718130759.67777-3-xuqiang36@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:07:59 +0000
From: Xu Qiang <xuqiang36@...wei.com>
To: <maz@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xuqiang36@...wei.com>,
<rui.xiang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next 2/2] irqdomain: Replace revmap_direct_max_irq field with hwirq_max field
In commit "4f86a06e2d6e irqdomain: Make normal and nomap irqdomains exclusive",
use revmap_size field instead of revmap_direct_max_irq. revmap_size field
originally indicates the maximum hwirq of linear Mapping. This results in
revmap_size having two different layers of meaning that can be confusing.
This patch optimization point is to solve this confusion point. During
direct mapping, the values of hwirq_max and revmap_direct_max_irq are the same
and have the same meanings. They both indicate the maximum hwirq supported by
direct Mapping. The optimization method is to delete revmap_direct_max_irq
field and use hwirq_max instead of revmap_direct_max_irq.
Signed-off-by: Xu Qiang <xuqiang36@...wei.com>
---
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index 481abb885d61..384eb9166804 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -147,7 +147,8 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, unsigned int s
static atomic_t unknown_domains;
if (WARN_ON((size && direct_max) ||
- (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_NOMAP) && direct_max)))
+ (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_NOMAP) && direct_max) ||
+ (direct_max && (direct_max != hwirq_max))))
return NULL;
domain = kzalloc_node(struct_size(domain, revmap, size),
@@ -219,7 +220,6 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, unsigned int s
domain->hwirq_max = hwirq_max;
if (direct_max) {
- size = direct_max;
domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_NO_MAP;
}
@@ -650,9 +650,9 @@ unsigned int irq_create_direct_mapping(struct irq_domain *domain)
pr_debug("create_direct virq allocation failed\n");
return 0;
}
- if (virq >= domain->revmap_size) {
+ if (virq >= domain->hwirq_max) {
pr_err("ERROR: no free irqs available below %i maximum\n",
- domain->revmap_size);
+ domain->hwirq_max);
irq_free_desc(virq);
return 0;
}
@@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ struct irq_desc *__irq_resolve_mapping(struct irq_domain *domain,
return desc;
if (irq_domain_is_nomap(domain)) {
- if (hwirq < domain->revmap_size) {
+ if (hwirq < domain->hwirq_max) {
data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, hwirq);
if (data && data->hwirq == hwirq)
desc = irq_data_to_desc(data);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists