[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtVhVKPAfzGmHu95@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:34:12 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@...il.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in __block_write_begin_int
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 06:11:37PM +0800, Wei Chen wrote:
> Dear Linux Developer,
>
> Recently when using our tool to fuzz kernel, the following crash was triggered:
This isn't interesting. As root, you were able to set up a config where
you blocked for too long. You can't just run syzcaller and say "hey, i
found a bug". You have to understand what would be interesting & useful
bugs to find.
> HEAD commit: 64570fbc14f8 Linux 5.15-rc5
> git tree: upstream
> compiler: clang 12.0.0
> console output:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dk3H5-D3ppxAONucKu_Vh7uXI2e94HyI/view?usp=sharing
> Syzlang reproducer:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dcYG-en7_om3HWtUUMip3vooPxr38is2/view?usp=sharing
> C reproducer: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15cJ2SBbvNIBJXFux85lmVFz5kbwNsY4w/view?usp=sharing
> kernel config: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lNwvovjLNrcuyFGrg05IoSmgO5jaKBBJ/view?usp=sharing
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@...il.com>
>
> INFO: task syz-executor:14691 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
> Not tainted 5.15.0-rc5+ #14
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> task:syz-executor state:D stack:25712 pid:14691 ppid: 6522 flags:0x00004004
> Call Trace:
> __schedule+0xc1a/0x11e0
> schedule+0x14b/0x210
> io_schedule+0x83/0x100
> bit_wait_io+0xe/0xc0
> __wait_on_bit+0xbb/0x180
> out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x1c3/0x240
> __block_write_begin_int+0x187e/0x1a10
> block_write_begin+0x54/0x2c0
> generic_perform_write+0x28c/0x5e0
> __generic_file_write_iter+0x26d/0x540
> blkdev_write_iter+0x3a2/0x560
> vfs_write+0x868/0xf50
> ksys_write+0x175/0x2b0
> do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> RIP: 0033:0x7f08ee707c4d
> RSP: 002b:00007f08ebc6fc58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f08ee82e0a0 RCX: 00007f08ee707c4d
> RDX: 00000000000006a8 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 00007f08ee780d80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f08ee82e0a0
> R13: 00007ffc57334f2f R14: 00007ffc573350d0 R15: 00007f08ebc6fdc0
>
> Showing all locks held in the system:
> 2 locks held by kworker/u2:1/10:
> 1 lock held by khungtaskd/21:
> #0: ffffffff8cf1c040 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x0/0x30
> 1 lock held by in:imklog/6329:
> #0: ffff888016c2dc70 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x26c/0x310
>
> =============================================
>
> NMI backtrace for cpu 0
> CPU: 0 PID: 21 Comm: khungtaskd Not tainted 5.15.0-rc5+ #14
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
> 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack_lvl+0x1d8/0x2c4
> nmi_cpu_backtrace+0x452/0x480
> nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x1a3/0x330
> watchdog+0xdbe/0xe30
> kthread+0x419/0x510
> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>
> Best,
> Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists