linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next V2 2/2] net/mlx5e: Improve remote NUMA preferences used for the IRQ affinity hints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YtVlDiLTPxm312u+@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:50:06 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 2/2] net/mlx5e: Improve remote NUMA
 preferences used for the IRQ affinity hints

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:43:15PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:

> Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
> Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> v2:
> Separated the set_cpu operation into two functions, per Saeed's suggestion.
> Added Saeed's Acked-by signature.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> index 229728c80233..e72bdaaad84f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
>  #include <linux/cpu_rmap.h>
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +#include <linux/sched/topology.h>
> +#endif
>  #include "mlx5_core.h"
>  #include "lib/eq.h"
>  #include "fpga/core.h"
> @@ -806,13 +809,67 @@ static void comp_irqs_release(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>  	kfree(table->comp_irqs);
>  }
>  
> +static void set_cpus_by_local_spread(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 *cpus,
> +				     int ncomp_eqs)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ncomp_eqs; i++)
> +		cpus[i] = cpumask_local_spread(i, dev->priv.numa_node);
> +}
> +
> +static bool set_cpus_by_numa_distance(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 *cpus,
> +				      int ncomp_eqs)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +	cpumask_var_t cpumask;
> +	int first;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		mlx5_core_err(dev, "zalloc_cpumask_var failed\n");
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +	cpumask_copy(cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
> +
> +	first = cpumask_local_spread(0, dev->priv.numa_node);

Arguably you want something like:

	first = cpumask_any(cpumask_of_node(dev->priv.numa_node));

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ncomp_eqs; i++) {
> +		int cpu;
> +
> +		cpu = sched_numa_find_closest(cpumask, first);
> +		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
> +			mlx5_core_err(dev, "sched_numa_find_closest failed, cpu(%d) >= nr_cpu_ids(%d)\n",
> +				      cpu, nr_cpu_ids);
> +
> +			free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
> +			return false;

So this will fail when ncomp_eqs > cpumask_weight(online_cpus); is that
desired?

> +		}
> +		cpus[i] = cpu;
> +		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpumask);

Since there is no concurrency on this cpumask, you don't need atomic
ops:

		__cpumask_clear_cpu(..);

> +	}
> +
> +	free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
> +	return true;
> +#else
> +	return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static void mlx5_set_eqs_cpus(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 *cpus, int ncomp_eqs)
> +{
> +	bool success = set_cpus_by_numa_distance(dev, cpus, ncomp_eqs);
> +
> +	if (!success)
> +		set_cpus_by_local_spread(dev, cpus, ncomp_eqs);
> +}
> +
>  static int comp_irqs_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	struct mlx5_eq_table *table = dev->priv.eq_table;
>  	int ncomp_eqs = table->num_comp_eqs;
>  	u16 *cpus;
>  	int ret;
> -	int i;
>  
>  	ncomp_eqs = table->num_comp_eqs;
>  	table->comp_irqs = kcalloc(ncomp_eqs, sizeof(*table->comp_irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -830,8 +887,7 @@ static int comp_irqs_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto free_irqs;
>  	}
> -	for (i = 0; i < ncomp_eqs; i++)
> -		cpus[i] = cpumask_local_spread(i, dev->priv.numa_node);
> +	mlx5_set_eqs_cpus(dev, cpus, ncomp_eqs);

So you change this for mlx5, what about the other users of
cpumask_local_spread() ?