[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegvez_DodKK+CJc1a7EHLDB+4wCSB2ay5NZWUCyoq1_ANw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:57:17 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fuse-devel <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
chenguanyou <chenguanyou9338@...il.com>,
Stanley Chu (朱原陞)
<stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Yong-xuan Wang (王詠萱)
<Yong-xuan.Wang@...iatek.com>, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fuse: add fuse_d_iput to postponed the iput
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 10:53, Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> When all the references of an inode are dropped, and write of its dirty
> pages is serving in Daemon, reclaim may deadlock on a regular allocation
> in Daemon.
>
> Add fuse_dentry_iput and some FI_* flags to postponed the iput for the
> inodes be using in fuse_write_inode.
I don't understand.
The inode must have a positive refcount during fuse_write_inode(), so
how would delaying an iput() change anything?
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists