linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: firmware: scm: Add compatible for SM6375

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Jul 2022 16:29:51 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Cc:     martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: firmware: scm: Add compatible for SM6375

On 16/07/2022 21:32, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Add a SCM compatible for SM6375.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt
> index b3f702cbed87..de7bb8b8d85e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ Required properties:
>   * "qcom,scm-sm8250"
>   * "qcom,scm-sm8350"
>   * "qcom,scm-sm8450"
> + * "qcom,sm6375-scm"

Uh, I think we wanted to keep it consistent with existing ones, didn't we?


Best regards,
Krzysztof