[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c553ae5a-3a95-7b24-09cf-506d1f4d2846@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:03:10 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <p.yadav@...com>, <michael@...le.cc>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: mt25qu: Ignore 6th ID byte
On 11/19/21 10:04, Alexander A Sverdlin wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
>
> Ignore 6th ID byte, secure version of mt25qu256a has 0x73 as 6th byte.
>
By reading the thread I understand that we don't have a complete view
about the differences between the two types of flashes, thus I'll
mark the patch with "Changes requested". Feel free to revive the thread
if you think we can progress on this topic.
Thanks,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists