[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUO_nR_b_+76LVEeTU87APW9GiMPhoMOV6KDQrtwCaaSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:19:12 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: timer: renesas,cmt: Add r8a779f0 and
generic Gen4 CMT support
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 9:57 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:06 PM Wolfram Sang
> <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/renesas,cmt.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/renesas,cmt.yaml
> > @@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ properties:
> > - renesas,r8a779a0-cmt0 # 32-bit CMT0 on R-Car V3U
> > - const: renesas,rcar-gen3-cmt0 # 32-bit CMT0 on R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2
> >
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - renesas,r8a779f0-cmt0 # 32-bit CMT0 on R-Car S4-8
> > + - const: renesas,rcar-gen4-cmt0 # 32-bit CMT0 on R-Car Gen4
> > +
> > - items:
> > - enum:
> > - renesas,r8a774a1-cmt1 # 48-bit CMT on RZ/G2M
> > @@ -100,6 +105,11 @@ properties:
> > - renesas,r8a779a0-cmt1 # 48-bit CMT on R-Car V3U
> > - const: renesas,rcar-gen3-cmt1 # 48-bit CMT on R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2
> >
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - renesas,r8a779f0-cmt1 # 48-bit CMT on R-Car S4-8
> > + - const: renesas,rcar-gen4-cmt1 # 48-bit CMT on R-Car Gen4
> > +
> > reg:
> > maxItems: 1
>
> The above is correct, but you forgot to update the conditional sections
> specifying the number of interrupts.
However, it would have been nice to adhere to the existing sort order
in the file... I will prepare a patch for both issues...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists