lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtadE201j+dt5jJx@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:01:23 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...gle.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 08:50:14AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 02:41:23PM -0700, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > Hi Stephen & Greg,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 1:43 PM Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 04:31:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > After merging the usb tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_typec_switch.c: In function 'cros_typec_cmd_mux_set':
> > > > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_typec_switch.c:52:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'cros_ec_command'; did you mean 'cros_ec_cmd'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > >    52 |         return cros_ec_command(sdata->ec, 0, EC_CMD_TYPEC_CONTROL, &req,
> > > >       |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >       |                cros_ec_cmd
> > > > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_typec_switch.c: In function 'cros_typec_register_switches':
> > > > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_typec_switch.c:244:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_evaluate_integer'; did you mean 'acpi_evaluate_object'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > >   244 |                 ret = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_ADR", NULL, &index);
> > > >       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >       |                       acpi_evaluate_object
> > > > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_typec_switch.c:244:49: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct acpi_device'
> > > >   244 |                 ret = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_ADR", NULL, &index);
> > > >       |                                                 ^~
> > > >
> > > > Caused by commit
> > > >
> > > >   e54369058f3d ("platform/chrome: cros_typec_switch: Add switch driver")
> > > >
> > > > and commits
> > > >
> > > >   34f375f0fdf6 ("platform/chrome: cros_typec_switch: Set EC retimer")
> > > >   bb53ad958012 ("platform/chrome: cros_typec_switch: Add event check")
> > > >
> > > > interacting with commit
> > > >
> > > >   b1d288d9c3c5 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: Rename cros_ec_command function")
> > > >
> > > > from the chrome-platform tree.
> > 
> > I am very sorry about the conflicts.
> > 
> > I can think of a few ways to address this:
> > 1. A fixup patch on top of linux-next updating the function signature
> > to cros_ec_cmd() ; I will send this out if you'd like.
> > 2. Pull in Commit b1d288d9c3c5 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto:
> > Rename cros_ec_command function") to usb-next.
> > We will also have to pull in dependent commit 015cd0043503
> > ("regulator: cros-ec: Use common cros_ec_command()")
> > 3. Revert the entire cros-typec-switch (patches 3-9) series from
> > usb-next and wait till after the merge window to apply it to
> > chrome-platform directly.
> 
> I think I'll just do #3 to resolve the issue.  I'll do it in a few
> hours.

Now all reverted from my tree.  Please send these changs through the
platform tree after the next -rc1 is released so that you don't end up
with build problems again.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ