[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220719090653.702ce6a2@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:06:53 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Wikner <kwikner@...z.ch>,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
Joseph Nuzman <joseph.nuzman@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 36/38] x86/ftrace: Make it call depth tracking aware
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:46:48 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Only the RET should do I think; you definitely don't need an ENDBR here
> nor do you need to override the unwind hint. Lemme try..
I'll replace with the RET and resend v2.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists