[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220719132931.p3amcmjsjzefmukq@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:29:31 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 15/15] net: dsa: qca8k: drop unnecessary
exposed function and make them static
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 02:57:26AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Some function were exposed to permit migration to common code. Drop them
> and make them static now that the user are in the same common code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> ---
Hmm, ideally the last patch that removes a certain function from being
called from qca8k-8xxx.c would also delete its prototype and make it
static in qca8k-common.c. Would that be hard to change?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists