linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 13/69] mm/mmap: use maple tree for unmapped_area{

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yt9dy1wpi3pi.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:20:41 +0200
From:   Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
Cc:     "maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org" <maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "damon @ lists . linux . dev" <damon@...ts.linux.dev>,
        SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
        alexander.gordeev@...ux.ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 13/69] mm/mmap: use maple tree for
 unmapped_area{_topdown}

Hi Liam,

Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com> writes:

> From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
>
> The maple tree code was added to find the unmapped area in a previous
> commit and was checked against what the rbtree returned, but the actual
> result was never used.  Start using the maple tree implementation and
> remove the rbtree code.
>
> Add kernel documentation comment for these functions.
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220504010716.661115-15-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
> Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>  mm/mmap.c | 253 +++++++-----------------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 221 deletions(-)

With next-20220718 git bisect pointed me to this commit because the
following code fails in compat mode (31 bit addressing) on s390:

#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <stdio.h>

#define __2GB__         0x80000000
#define VMA_SIZE        0x10000000
#define VMA_COUNT       (__2GB__ / VMA_SIZE)

/*
 * Repeated mapping below 2GB until all memory is exhausted
 */
int main(void)
{
        void *p;
        unsigned int i;

        for (i = 0; i < VMA_COUNT; i++) {
            p = mmap(NULL, VMA_SIZE, PROT_READ,MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
            printf("%d: %08x - %08x\n", i, (int)p, (int)p + VMA_SIZE);
            if (p == MAP_FAILED)
                  break;
            if (p > (void *)__2GB__) {
                  return 1;
            }
        }
        if ((i == 0) || (i >= VMA_COUNT))
               return 2;
        return 0;
}

With linux/master:
# ./mmap_compat_anon
0: 67a00000 - 77a00000
1: 57a00000 - 67a00000
2: 47a00000 - 57a00000
3: 37a00000 - 47a00000
4: 27a00000 - 37a00000
5: 17a00000 - 27a00000
6: 07a00000 - 17a00000
7: ffffffff - 0fffffff

With next-20220718 (and older, we're seeing this for a while, but i
didn't notice due to vacation and other priorities):

# ./mmap_compat_anon
0: 67600000 - 77600000
1: 57600000 - 67600000
2: 47600000 - 57600000
3: 37600000 - 47600000
4: 27600000 - 37600000
5: 17600000 - 27600000
6: 07600000 - 17600000
7: 40000000 - 50000000

So the first output is correct - mmap succeeds until there's no space
left, where it returns MAP_FAILED. In the lower (failing) one, mmap
instead returns an address that is already in use.

Regards
Sven