[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtbLa54+0A4SyR9+@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:19:07 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] net: introduce OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (ovpn-dco)
> +void ovpn_crypto_key_slot_delete(struct ovpn_crypto_state *cs,
> + enum ovpn_key_slot slot)
> +{
> + struct ovpn_crypto_key_slot *ks = NULL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&cs->mutex);
> + switch (slot) {
> + case OVPN_KEY_SLOT_PRIMARY:
> + ks = rcu_replace_pointer(cs->primary, NULL,
> + lockdep_is_held(&cs->mutex));
> + break;
> + case OVPN_KEY_SLOT_SECONDARY:
> + ks = rcu_replace_pointer(cs->secondary, NULL,
> + lockdep_is_held(&cs->mutex));
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_warn("Invalid slot to release: %u\n", slot);
> + break;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&cs->mutex);
> +
> + if (!ks) {
> + pr_debug("Key slot already released: %u\n", slot);
> + return;
> + }
> + pr_debug("deleting key slot %u, key_id=%u\n", slot, ks->key_id);
As a general comment throughout the code, pr_ functions are not
liked. Since this is a network device, it would be better to use
netdev_debug(), netdev_warn() etc, so indicating which device is
outputting warnings or debug info.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists