| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZ1hrX0t_pNq=-LcK_ThX+jk0jRzbAedEyc1gYtw1LKHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:32:32 -0700
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: vmpressure: don't count proactive reclaim in vmpressure
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:49 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> vmpressure is used in cgroup v1 to notify userspace of reclaim
> efficiency events, and is also used in both cgroup v1 and v2 as a signal
> for memory pressure for networking, see
> mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure().
>
> Proactive reclaim intends to probe memcgs for cold memory, without
> affecting their performance. Hence, reclaim caused by writing to
> memory.reclaim should not trigger vmpressure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Removed unneeded reclaim_options local variables (Andrew).
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Limited the vmpressure change to memory.reclaim, dropped psi changes,
> updated changelog to reflect new behavior (Michal, Shakeel)
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Removed unnecessary initializations to zero (Andrew).
> - Separate declarations and initializations when it causes line wrapping
> (Andrew).
>
> ---
> include/linux/swap.h | 5 ++++-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> mm/vmscan.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index 0c0fed1b348f..f6e9eaa2339f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -411,10 +411,13 @@ extern void lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
> extern unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone);
> extern unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
> gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *mask);
> +
> +#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP (1 << 1)
> +#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE (1 << 2)
> extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> unsigned long nr_pages,
> gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - bool may_swap);
> + unsigned int reclaim_options);
> extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
> pg_data_t *pgdat,
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index a550042d88c3..b668224142c7 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2331,7 +2331,8 @@ static unsigned long reclaim_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>
> psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
> nr_reclaimed += try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages,
> - gfp_mask, true);
> + gfp_mask,
> + MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP);
> psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
> } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) &&
> !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg));
> @@ -2576,7 +2577,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> struct page_counter *counter;
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
> bool passed_oom = false;
> - bool may_swap = true;
> + unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
> bool drained = false;
> unsigned long pflags;
>
> @@ -2593,7 +2594,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_counter(counter, memory);
> } else {
> mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_counter(counter, memsw);
> - may_swap = false;
> + reclaim_options &= ~MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
> }
>
> if (batch > nr_pages) {
> @@ -2620,7 +2621,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>
> psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
> nr_reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem_over_limit, nr_pages,
> - gfp_mask, may_swap);
> + gfp_mask, reclaim_options);
> psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
>
> if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
> @@ -3402,8 +3403,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1,
> - GFP_KERNEL, !memsw)) {
> + if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
> + memsw ? 0 : MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP)) {
> ret = -EBUSY;
> break;
> }
> @@ -3513,7 +3514,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> if (signal_pending(current))
> return -EINTR;
>
> - if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL, true))
> + if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
> + MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP))
> nr_retries--;
> }
>
> @@ -6248,7 +6250,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_high_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> }
>
> reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - high,
> - GFP_KERNEL, true);
> + GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP);
>
> if (!reclaimed && !nr_retries--)
> break;
> @@ -6297,7 +6299,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>
> if (nr_reclaims) {
> if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - max,
> - GFP_KERNEL, true))
> + GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP))
> nr_reclaims--;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -6426,6 +6428,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_reclaim(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
> unsigned int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> unsigned long nr_to_reclaim, nr_reclaimed = 0;
> + unsigned int reclaim_options;
> int err;
>
> buf = strstrip(buf);
> @@ -6433,6 +6436,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_reclaim(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP | MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE;
> while (nr_reclaimed < nr_to_reclaim) {
> unsigned long reclaimed;
>
> @@ -6449,7 +6453,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_reclaim(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
>
> reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg,
> nr_to_reclaim - nr_reclaimed,
> - GFP_KERNEL, true);
> + GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options);
>
> if (!reclaimed && !nr_retries--)
> return -EAGAIN;
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index f7d9a683e3a7..0969e6408a53 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@ struct scan_control {
> /* Can pages be swapped as part of reclaim? */
> unsigned int may_swap:1;
>
> + /* Proactive reclaim invoked by userspace through memory.reclaim */
> + unsigned int proactive:1;
> +
> /*
> * Cgroup memory below memory.low is protected as long as we
> * don't threaten to OOM. If any cgroup is reclaimed at
> @@ -3125,9 +3128,10 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
> sc->priority);
>
> /* Record the group's reclaim efficiency */
> - vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false,
> - sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
> - sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
> + if (!sc->proactive)
> + vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false,
> + sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
> + sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
>
> } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, memcg, NULL)));
> }
> @@ -3250,9 +3254,10 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
> }
>
> /* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
> - vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup, true,
> - sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
> - sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
> + if (!sc->proactive)
> + vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup, true,
> + sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
> + sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
>
> if (sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed)
> reclaimable = true;
> @@ -3534,8 +3539,9 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> __count_zid_vm_events(ALLOCSTALL, sc->reclaim_idx, 1);
>
> do {
> - vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
> - sc->priority);
> + if (!sc->proactive)
> + vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
> + sc->priority);
> sc->nr_scanned = 0;
> shrink_zones(zonelist, sc);
>
> @@ -3825,7 +3831,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> unsigned long nr_pages,
> gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - bool may_swap)
> + unsigned int reclaim_options)
> {
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
> unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
> @@ -3838,7 +3844,8 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> .priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
> .may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
> .may_unmap = 1,
> - .may_swap = may_swap,
> + .may_swap = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP),
> + .proactive = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE),
> };
> /*
> * Traverse the ZONELIST_FALLBACK zonelist of the current node to put
> --
> 2.37.0.144.g8ac04bfd2-goog
>
Hey Michal,
Any outstanding comments/thoughts on this version?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists