linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: ufs-pci: Correct check for RESET DSM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a0a97a0e-3a09-2162-243c-b85008eb725d@acm.org>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 11:13:53 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...omium.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: ufs-pci: Correct check for RESET DSM

On 7/18/22 17:19, Daniil Lunev wrote:
> dsm_fns is a bitmap, and it is 0-indexed according to the check in
> __intel_dsm funciton. But common initialization was checking it as if it
> was 1-indexed. The CL corrects the discrepancy. This change won't break
> any existing calls to the function, since before the change both bits 0
> and 1 were checked and needed to be set.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>