linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH REBASE] regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:54:51 +0200
From:   Christian Kohlschütter 
        <christian@...lschutter.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASE] regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for
 always-on/boot-on regulators

Woohoo, my first patch — thanks a lot, Mark!

> Am 19.07.2022 um 20:48 schrieb Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>:
> 
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:02:00 +0200, Christian Kohlschütter wrote:
>> Regulators marked with "regulator-always-on" or "regulator-boot-on"
>> as well as an "off-on-delay-us", may run into cycling issues that are
>> hard to detect.
>> 
>> This is caused by the "last_off" state not being initialized in this
>> case.
>> 
>> [...]
> 
> Applied to
> 
>   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1/1] regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators
>      commit: 218320fec29430438016f88dd4fbebfa1b95ad8d
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
> 
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark